I’m not sure. Hopefully they can speak up here…
No. I think I am conflating two things in this proposal and should remove all code-related things from it. This section is referring to Maintainers in the code perspective, not managing the open collective.
This is the current process
Yes. This is to help ensure that the community is the entity in charge of the money and prevents it being a authoritarian dictatorship with the management of finances.
Sure, code projects are included and I can add them to the list there, though it is not exhaustive. An estimated cost would definitely be required and additional costs would need to go through additional review and approval.
All projects worth proposing
I agree, yes, this should be just Reimbursements