# OpenCollective Spending Proposal

**URL:** <https://discourse.libretime.org/t/opencollective-spending-proposal/806>\
**Category:** Community\
**Created:** [February 19, 2021, 8:14pm UTC](https://discourse.libretime.org/t/opencollective-spending-proposal/806 "2021-02-19T20:14:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 28

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gusaus](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/discourse.libretime.org/gusaus/32/42_2.png) [@gusaus](https://discourse.libretime.org/u/gusaus)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2022, 7:08pm UTC](https://discourse.libretime.org/t/opencollective-spending-proposal/806/28 "2022-04-11T19:08:32Z")

</div>

Understood - my suggestions (at the tail end of [my previous comment](https://discourse.libretime.org/t/opencollective-spending-proposal/806/26)) have more to do with larger issues of enabling current and future maintainers the ability to spend time on [development priorities](https://discourse.libretime.org/t/libretime-development-priorities/51/9) and [sustaining the project](https://discourse.libretime.org/t/libretime-services-and-other-ways-to-sustain-the-project/326), rather than the spending policy itself.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.libretime.org/t/opencollective-spending-proposal/806)._