# LibreTime services (and other ways to sustain the project)

**URL:** <https://discourse.libretime.org/t/libretime-services-and-other-ways-to-sustain-the-project/326>\
**Category:** Community\
**Created:** [July 31, 2019, 12:10am UTC](https://discourse.libretime.org/t/libretime-services-and-other-ways-to-sustain-the-project/326 "2019-07-31T00:10:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gusaus](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/discourse.libretime.org/gusaus/32/42_2.png) [@gusaus](https://discourse.libretime.org/u/gusaus)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2019, 8:32pm UTC](https://discourse.libretime.org/t/libretime-services-and-other-ways-to-sustain-the-project/326/7 "2019-10-11T20:32:28Z")

</div>

> [@robbt](#):
>
> I’d be open to the idea but it would depend upon us having more $ flowing into our project than we have currently available.

As [mentioned here](https://discourse.libretime.org/t/libretime-development-priorities/51/13), I think all this would be in scope with the Open Collective sponsored initiative.

> [@robbt](#):
>
> Most of the things we need to accomplish are on the higher complexity range and even small contributions can be tricky because the frameworks we are using are so outdated from the point of view of most web developers.

Sounds like you’re making a good case for setting a budget goal that would enable maintainers to spend more time on the project.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.libretime.org/t/libretime-services-and-other-ways-to-sustain-the-project/326)._